SNP | News

Mega Dams Remain Controversial Source of Energy

Mega Dams UN Article 6-6-16

by Lyndal Rowlands 

UNITED NATIONS, Jun 6 2016 (IPS) - Although mega dams can have devastating impacts on ecosystems and indigenous communities, many of the world’s poorest countries still see them as a way to fill gaping holes in their energy supplies.

One such project is the Inga III dam, in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The dam is a part of the larger Inga project, which when completed will be the biggest dam project in the world, almost twice as big as the Three Gorges Dam in China.

In March 2014, the World Bank awarded the project $73 million to carry out environmental and social impact assessments, however two years later, these assessments have yet to begin, and the advocacy group International Rivers now fears that construction of the project may be rushed ahead without them.

According to International Rivers the head of the Grand Inga Project Office, recently announced that construction of the dam was set to begin by 2017, whether or not the relevant impact assessments had taken place before hand.
The World Bank told IPS that it is “continuing dialogue with the Government of DRC about the implementation arrangements of the Inga-3 BC (Inga III) project, with the goal of ensuring the project follows international good practice.”

However Bosshard believes that the DRC’s track record of implementing mega projects, including the Inga I and Inga II projects which he said were one of the main components of a debt crisis in the Democratic Republic of Congo, has ultimately been one of failure.

“Wind and solar aren’t the small brothers and sisters of hydropower anymore and they really have become mainstream and it’s a pity that the World Bank (hasn’t realised) that the era of mega dams, that time has passed around the world.” -- Peter Bosshard, International Rivers.

The West African country is described as being afflicted by the so-called resource curse, due to high levels of poverty and conflict despite its wealth in natural resources.

International Rivers also do not believe that the Inga III project will necessarily benefit the DRC population, 90 percent of whom have no access to electricity, but instead will largely produce energy for export markets and mining operations in the DRC.

The Inga III is not the only controversial mega dam project. Although these projects can provide a significant amount of energy, they also meet with significant resistance across the developing world, particularly from Indigenous groups whose lands are often disproportionately impacted by these projects.

The Indigenous peoples who protest these dams often pay with their lives, as was the case with Honduran Indigenous activist Berta Caceres whose protests against the Agua Zarca Dam led to her murder earlier this year.

The dams not only have environmental impacts on rivers and forests, but also pose an existential threat to indigenous groups.

Manu Ampim, Director of the Save Nubia Project, told IPS that ”a series of recent and current dam projects in the Sudan (have) and will continue to devastate various cultural groups,” including the Amri, the Manasir and the Nubian.

Ampim said that the impact of dams on the Nubian people is particularly concerning because “ancient Nubia is one of the most significant Nile Valley civilizations, dating back many millennia.”

Ampim said that there should be international pressure on the Sudanese government “to change plans to the use of more efficient and clean, and less destructive, sources of energy, such as solar energy, micro-hydro, and wind turbine.”

However while wind and solar projects have been increasingly significantly in capacity, Angus McCrone, Chief Editor at Bloomberg New Energy Finance told IPS that current and future dam projects still have a role to play in meeting energy needs.

“A lot of developing countries want to do both, they do want large hydro if they’ve got the resources for it and they also want wind and solar,” he said.

Yet McCrone noted that the sustainability of dam projects is variable.
“If you’re looking at sustainability some large hydro projects score well and some don’t.”

“There are some large hydro projects that are pretty heavily criticised for sustainability whether it’s causing methane release or effecting biodiversity or causing international tension between countries because of some damming up the rivers,” he said.

McCrone also noted that wind and solar have a “speed advantage” which makes them “pretty attractive to developing countries with rapidly rising energy needs.”

While the variable sustainability of mega dam projects is one reason why Bloomberg New Energy Finance does not include mega hydro in their annual reports on renewable energy trends, McCrone says that there are checks in place to ensure that the projects are sustainable.

“(When) the development banks lend to renewable energy projects they go through a decision making process on large hydro projects and in practice they support some of them and they don’t support others,” said McCrone.

However Bosshard noted that while he also is not against all hydro projects, that the severe consequences of these projects are often underestimated.

“If you could build a project of 4800 megawatts with very little displacement and possibly limited environmental impacts we would not in principle be opposed to that,” he said. “But obviously this approach doesn’t happen in a vacuum, this approach happens in a country (the DRC) that has all the experience in trying to build mega projects and has ultimately failed.”

Bosshard said that recent developments in wind and solar technologies meant that they had become much more viable alternatives to mega dams.

“At a time when wind and solar are breaking even on financial terms and you can build them in one or two years why wait 10 years for a new hydropower dam,” said Bosshard.

“Wind and solar aren’t the small brothers and sisters of hydropower any more and they really have become mainstream and it’s a pity that the World Bank (hasn’t realised) that the era of mega dams, that time has passed around the world.”

Eastern Sudan Dams Complex to Start Operating in June 2016

Setit Dam
Construction of the Setit Dam (Sudanese Dams Implementation Unit)

July 30 - 2015 Khartoum -

A hydroelectric generating plant connected to the Upper Atbara and Setit Dams Complex in eastern Sudan will start operating in June next year.

The new power project will add 320 megawatts to the national grid, as it seeks to meet a demand of 2,500 megawats, according to Mohamed Abdelrahim Gawish, a spokesman for the Water Resources and Electricity Ministry told BloombergBusiness in an interview in Khartoum on 23 July.

"We want to exploit more hydropower resources to mitigate the high cost and frequent maintenance of the thermal electricity units that burn fuel to generate power," Gawish said.

Sudan normally makes up its shortfall with imports from neighbouring Ethiopia, which has had no surplus energy during the past two months, he explained.

Power outage sparked unrest in several parts of the country during the past few months.  In Khartoum and several towns in northern and eastern Sudan, people took to the streets.

On 22 July, President Al Bashir held a special meeting with Mutaz Mousa, the federal Minister of Water Resources and Electricity, to discuss the boosting of the country's power capacity until 2020.  Mousa proposed increasing the electricity tariffs in a way that would not harm low-income households, the state-run Sudan News Agency (Suna) reported.

More than 60 percent of Sudan's electricity - about 1,250 megawatts - is generated by the Merowe Damm in the Northern State, 350 kilometres north of Khartoum.  Two thermal power plants in Khartoum and one in White Nile State produce an additional 800 megawatts.

The new power project in eastern Sudan, with two dams and generating stations, costs about $1.3 billion and is financed by Sudan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, China, and Algeria.


In February, the largest relocaton operation in Sudan caused by the construction of dams commenced.  By mid-March, tens of thousands of people living near the site of the Atbara and Setit (or Seteet) Dam Complex in Kassala State were moved.

One of the affected residents complained to Radio Dabanga on 23 February that the dam complex management began flooding their lands without keeping its commitments towards the population. Compensation promised to herders and shopkeepers in the area was delayed.

The official opening of the Rumeila Dam on the Upper Atbara and the Burdana Dam on the Setit River was originally scheduled for coming September.

The dam project is also supposed to create some ten million acres of new farmland in Kassala State and neighbouring El Gedaref State, at a cost $840 million, according to the dams' chief engineer.

Atbara-Setit Dam Complex 
Upper Atbara and Setit Dam Complex 

Newsletter Signup

Shopping Cart

The cart is empty

Download Our SNP Brochure (PDF)

Download our brochure (PDF).


Watch Our Videos

Our Mission ...

Testimonials ...

Donate to Save Ancient Kush & Nubia

Please make a donation to help preserve classical African history.  Your assistance will help support field research to designate northern and eastern Sudan as a region with World Heritage Sites under threat.

Thank you!

Amount Tooltip $1,000.00
Payment method